One thing could not be determined from the record.
What EPA and state records show about this community water system — compliance, PFAS testing, lead sampling, and where its water comes from. Serving about 8,150 people in Cumberland County.
8,150people served
0health-based violations since 2021
0without recorded resolution
2administrative (paperwork) records
What the records flag
Needs attention
PFOS measured at 14 ppt — above the 4 ppt limit systems must meet by 2029
This is not a violation today. EPA's PFAS limits take effect in 2029 (an extension to 2031 has been proposed).
PFOA
10.1 ppt (limit 4)
PFOS
14 ppt (limit 4)
Measured in your water system · U.S. EPA — UCMR5 nationwide PFAS monitoring · retrieved 2026-08-15 · source
No issues on record
No health-based violations on record since 2021
Records can lag by up to a quarter, and they don't cover your home's own plumbing.
Official record for your water system · U.S. EPA — Safe Drinking Water Act compliance records · retrieved 2026-08-16 · source
Lead & copper sampling
Lead: latest 90th-percentile result 0 ppb — below the 10 ppb action level (sampled 2025-12-31, 4 results in the 10-year window).
The 90th-percentile result means 9 out of 10 sampled homes were at or below this level. It measures the water system's corrosion control — it cannot tell you whether your own home's plumbing adds lead. Results older than 10 years, future-dated compliance periods, and physically implausible values are excluded.
PFAS testing
29 PFAS compounds tested under EPA's UCMR5 program; 8 detected.
PFOA: up to 10.1 ppt — above the 4 ppt limit systems must meet by 2029.
PFOS: up to 14 ppt — above the 4 ppt limit systems must meet by 2029.
UCMR5 sampling (2023–2026) at entry points to the distribution system. 'Not detected' means below the reporting limit (~4 ppt for PFOA/PFOS), not zero. A result above a future MCL is not a violation today — compliance deadlines are 2029 (2031 extension proposed). These results describe treated water leaving the plant — not the river or lake this system draws from.
Where the water comes from
Surface water.
Buys water from City of Dunn, whose recent record shows no unresolved health-based violations.
Also holds emergency-only connections (Fayetteville Public Works Comm) — backup interconnections, not routine supply.
What the record doesn’t establish
Whether your home's own plumbing adds lead or copper — no dataset covers indoor pipes.
Common questions
Does Eastover Sanitary District have drinking water violations?
No health-based violations on record since 2021. Records can lag by up to a quarter, and they don't cover building plumbing.
Has Eastover Sanitary District been tested for PFAS?
Yes — 29 PFAS compounds under EPA's UCMR5 program, with 8 detected. PFOA measured up to 10.1 ppt, above the 4 ppt limit that takes effect in 2029; PFOS measured up to 14 ppt, above the 4 ppt limit that takes effect in 2029. Samples are taken at entry points to the distribution system — treated water, not source water.
How many people does Eastover Sanitary District serve?
EPA records list about 8,150 people served in Cumberland. Service-area boundaries have known errors — a water bill is the ground truth for any single address.
Records lag their agencies' refresh cycles — a recent change may not appear yet. Absence from a dataset is absence of a record, never evidence that water is clean.
Go deeper
Search any address this system serves for the full report — the waters around it, what's permitted upstream, and every term explained.