Junaluska Sanitary District: drinking water record
Two things here need attention.
One thing could not be determined from the record.
What EPA and state records show about this community water system — compliance, PFAS testing, lead sampling, and where its water comes from. Serving about 5,138 people in Haywood County.
5,138people served
1health-based violations since 2021
1without recorded resolution
1administrative (paperwork) records
What the records flag
Needs attention
This system buys water from WAYNESVILLE, TOWN OF, which has 1 unresolved health-based violation
Purchased water is treated by the seller before it arrives, so the seller's compliance record travels with the water it sells.
Water purchased from
WAYNESVILLE, TOWN OF
Seller's unresolved health-based
1
Official record for your water system · U.S. EPA — Safe Drinking Water Act compliance records · retrieved 2026-08-16 · source
Needs attention
1 health-based violation with no recorded resolution
A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment step wasn't met.
Health-based, since 2021
1
Without recorded resolution
1
Official record for your water system · U.S. EPA — Safe Drinking Water Act compliance records · retrieved 2026-08-16 · source
No issues on record
No PFAS detected above reporting limits across 29 compounds
Measured in your water system · U.S. EPA — UCMR5 nationwide PFAS monitoring · retrieved 2026-08-15 · source
Lead & copper sampling
Lead: latest 90th-percentile result 3 ppb — below the 10 ppb action level (sampled 2025-12-31, 4 results in the 10-year window).
The 90th-percentile result means 9 out of 10 sampled homes were at or below this level. It measures the water system's corrosion control — it cannot tell you whether your own home's plumbing adds lead. Results older than 10 years, future-dated compliance periods, and physically implausible values are excluded.
PFAS testing
29 PFAS compounds tested under EPA's UCMR5 program; 0 detected.
UCMR5 sampling (2023–2026) at entry points to the distribution system. 'Not detected' means below the reporting limit (~4 ppt for PFOA/PFOS), not zero. A result above a future MCL is not a violation today — compliance deadlines are 2029 (2031 extension proposed). These results describe treated water leaving the plant — not the river or lake this system draws from.
Where the water comes from
Surface water.
Buys water from Town of Waynesville — which has 1 unresolved health-based violation on record. Purchased water is treated by the seller, so the seller's record travels with it.
Also holds emergency-only connections (Maggie Valley Sanitary Dist) — backup interconnections, not routine supply.
What the record doesn’t establish
Whether your home's own plumbing adds lead or copper — no dataset covers indoor pipes.
Common questions
Does Junaluska Sanitary District have drinking water violations?
EPA compliance records list 1 health-based violation since 2021, 1 without a recorded resolution. Administrative (paperwork) records are counted separately and never added in.
Has Junaluska Sanitary District been tested for PFAS?
Yes — 29 PFAS compounds under EPA's UCMR5 program, with 0 detected. Samples are taken at entry points to the distribution system — treated water, not source water.
How many people does Junaluska Sanitary District serve?
EPA records list about 5,138 people served in Haywood. Service-area boundaries have known errors — a water bill is the ground truth for any single address.
Records lag their agencies' refresh cycles — a recent change may not appear yet. Absence from a dataset is absence of a record, never evidence that water is clean.
Go deeper
Search any address this system serves for the full report — the waters around it, what's permitted upstream, and every term explained.