WHAT’S BEYOND THE TAP

North Carolina · county

Water quality in Yadkin County, North Carolina

One thing here needs attention.

Two things could not be determined from the record.

Public records for Yadkin County cover 52 named waterways across 22 sub-watersheds, and 74 active water systems serving about 17,243 people. Below is what those records establish — and what they don't.

52waterways on record
3not considered safe for swimming
0under fish-consumption advisories
2never assessed at all
74water systems
5with an unresolved health-based violation

What the records flag

Needs attention

East Double Creek is not considered safe for swimming

A state determination under the Clean Water Act. This is one of several assessed waterways in the area you searched — search a street address to see which waters connect to you.

Listed cause
FECAL COLIFORM

Official determination, waterway near you · U.S. EPA / state agency — ATTAINS assessed waters

Rivers, creeks & lakes

WaterwaySwimmingEating the fishListed causes
Cedar CreekNot assessedNot assessedFISH BIOASSESSMENTS
Crooked Run CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Deep CreekOn record, no conclusionNot assessedTURBIDITY
East Double CreekNot considered safeNot assessedFECAL COLIFORM
Forbush CreekNot assessedMeets the standardBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Hunting CreekOn record, no conclusionMeets the standardTOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
Logan CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Martin Mill CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
North Deep CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
South Deep CreekOn record, no conclusionNot assessedTOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS), TURBIDITY
UT to UT to North Deep CreekNot considered safeNot assessedFECAL COLIFORM
YADKIN RIVERMeets the standardMeets the standardZINC

Showing 12 of 52 waterways on record — the full report has all of them. "Not considered safe" is a state determination under the Clean Water Act, not a measurement taken today. "Not assessed" means unknown — never clean.

Drinking water systems

SystemServesHealth-based violations since 2021Without recorded resolution
Town of Yadkinville4,19600
Town of Jonesville2,35411
Town of Boonville2,00711
Town of East Bend1,46600
Forbush High School1,44700
Peace Haven Baptist Church80000
Fall Creek Elem School31700
Fall Creek Baptist Church30000
Forbush Elem School29100
Yadkin Co Water - Hwy 2127700
Mountain View Baptist Church27500
Holly Ridge Family Campground22900

Showing the 12 largest of 74 active systems serving the county. Health-based violations are shown alone — administrative (paperwork) records are counted separately and never added in, because most violation records are paperwork.

What the record doesn’t establish

  • 2 nearby waterways have never been assessed — their condition is unknown.
  • Whether your home's own plumbing adds lead or copper — no dataset covers indoor pipes.

Common questions

Is tap water safe to drink in Yadkin County?

No public dataset can establish that any tap is safe or unsafe — records have gaps, lag by up to a quarter, and say nothing about a building's own plumbing or private wells.

What the records do show: 74 active water systems serve Yadkin County. 5 of them currently have an unresolved health-based violation on record. Health-based violations are counted separately from paperwork violations, which make up most records.

Which waterways in Yadkin County are not considered safe for swimming?

State assessments under the Clean Water Act list East Double Creek, UT to UT to North Deep Creek, Roaring River as not supporting recreation. That is an official determination about the waterway, not a measurement taken today.

40 of the county's waterways on record have never been assessed for swimming — their condition is unknown.

How current is this data?

Datasets refresh on their agencies' cycles — EPA drinking-water records quarterly, state waterway assessments roughly every two years. The sources table on this page lists the version and retrieval date of every dataset used.

Sources

DatasetAgency versionRetrieved
EPA/state ATTAINS waterway assessmentsATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS snapshot (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-15
ATTAINS waterway geometryATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS lines + areas (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-16
Census TIGER county boundariesCensus TIGERweb Counties (current vintage)2026-08-16
NC DEQ PFAS monitoringNC DEQ DWR EQuIS export, samples through 2025-07-292026-08-17
Census TIGER place boundariesCensus TIGERweb Places (Incorporated + CDP, current vintage)2026-08-16
EPA water system service areasEPA PWS Service Areas v3 (hosted layer, item 80c6912ef14f46e480f5afd807767b4b)2026-08-15
EPA Safe Drinking Water Act compliance recordsECHO SDWA quarterly bulk download2026-08-16
EPA standards & benchmarks2026-08 curation2026-08-15
EPA UCMR5 PFAS monitoringUCMR5 occurrence data (collections through 2025-12-10)2026-08-15
USGS watershed boundariesUSGS WBD via National Map MapServer2026-08-15

Records lag their agencies' refresh cycles — a recent change may not appear yet. Absence from a dataset is absence of a record, never evidence that water is clean.

Go deeper

The interactive report adds the map, monitoring-station samples, permitted operations in connected watersheds, and plain-language explanations of every term.

See the full Yadkin County report