WHAT’S BEYOND THE TAP

North Carolina · county

Water quality in Rutherford County, North Carolina

One thing here needs attention.

Two things could not be determined from the record.

Public records for Rutherford County cover 104 named waterways across 34 sub-watersheds, and 60 active water systems serving about 55,748 people. Below is what those records establish — and what they don't.

104waterways on record
13not considered safe for swimming
0under fish-consumption advisories
10never assessed at all
60water systems
8with an unresolved health-based violation

What the records flag

Needs attention

B-259 is not considered safe for swimming

A state determination under the Clean Water Act. This is one of several assessed waterways in the area you searched — search a street address to see which waters connect to you.

Listed cause
ESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI)

Official determination, waterway near you · U.S. EPA / state agency — ATTAINS assessed waters

Rivers, creeks & lakes

WaterwaySwimmingEating the fishListed causes
B-259Not considered safeNot assessedESCHERICHIA COLI (E. COLI)
BROAD RIVERMeets the standardMeets the standardBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Catheys CreekNot assessedNot assessedFISH BIOASSESSMENTS
Cleghorn CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
First Broad RiverMeets the standardNot assessedTURBIDITY
Henry ForkNot assessedNot assessedFISH PASSAGE BARRIER, FLOW REGIME MODIFICATION
Hinton CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Hollands CreekNot assessedNot assessedFISH BIOASSESSMENTS
Mill CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Sandy Run CreekNot assessedNot assessedFISH BIOASSESSMENTS
South Muddy CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Big Camp Creek (Camp Creek)Not assessedNot assessed

Showing 12 of 104 waterways on record — the full report has all of them. "Not considered safe" is a state determination under the Clean Water Act, not a measurement taken today. "Not assessed" means unknown — never clean.

Drinking water systems

SystemServesHealth-based violations since 2021Without recorded resolution
Town of Forest City21,52100
Broad River Water Authority18,24200
Town of Ellenboro2,32211
Concord Comm Water System1,86700
Fairfield Mountains No 11,79800
Town of Lake Lure1,17611
Town of Bostic95300
Fairfield MTNS-Apple Valley95000
Northgate Golden Valley, LLC85011
Chimney Rock State Park82000
Daniel Morgan WTR District-NC37611
The Mason Jar30000

Showing the 12 largest of 60 active systems serving the county. Health-based violations are shown alone — administrative (paperwork) records are counted separately and never added in, because most violation records are paperwork.

What the record doesn’t establish

  • 10 nearby waterways have never been assessed — their condition is unknown.
  • Whether your home's own plumbing adds lead or copper — no dataset covers indoor pipes.

Common questions

Is tap water safe to drink in Rutherford County?

No public dataset can establish that any tap is safe or unsafe — records have gaps, lag by up to a quarter, and say nothing about a building's own plumbing or private wells.

What the records do show: 60 active water systems serve Rutherford County. 8 of them currently have an unresolved health-based violation on record. Health-based violations are counted separately from paperwork violations, which make up most records.

Which waterways in Rutherford County are not considered safe for swimming?

State assessments under the Clean Water Act list B-259, B-042, Cane Creek, Hunting Creek, RS-03514 and 8 more as not supporting recreation. That is an official determination about the waterway, not a measurement taken today.

81 of the county's waterways on record have never been assessed for swimming — their condition is unknown.

How current is this data?

Datasets refresh on their agencies' cycles — EPA drinking-water records quarterly, state waterway assessments roughly every two years. The sources table on this page lists the version and retrieval date of every dataset used.

Sources

DatasetAgency versionRetrieved
EPA/state ATTAINS waterway assessmentsATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS snapshot (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-15
ATTAINS waterway geometryATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS lines + areas (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-16
Census TIGER county boundariesCensus TIGERweb Counties (current vintage)2026-08-16
NC DEQ PFAS monitoringNC DEQ DWR EQuIS export, samples through 2025-07-292026-08-17
Census TIGER place boundariesCensus TIGERweb Places (Incorporated + CDP, current vintage)2026-08-16
EPA water system service areasEPA PWS Service Areas v3 (hosted layer, item 80c6912ef14f46e480f5afd807767b4b)2026-08-15
EPA Safe Drinking Water Act compliance recordsECHO SDWA quarterly bulk download2026-08-16
EPA standards & benchmarks2026-08 curation2026-08-15
EPA UCMR5 PFAS monitoringUCMR5 occurrence data (collections through 2025-12-10)2026-08-15
USGS watershed boundariesUSGS WBD via National Map MapServer2026-08-15

Records lag their agencies' refresh cycles — a recent change may not appear yet. Absence from a dataset is absence of a record, never evidence that water is clean.

Go deeper

The interactive report adds the map, monitoring-station samples, permitted operations in connected watersheds, and plain-language explanations of every term.

See the full Rutherford County report