WHAT’S BEYOND THE TAP

North Carolina · county

Water quality in Guilford County, North Carolina

One thing here needs attention.

Two things could not be determined from the record.

Public records for Guilford County cover 96 named waterways across 36 sub-watersheds, and 207 active water systems serving about 489,580 people. Below is what those records establish — and what they don't.

96waterways on record
11not considered safe for swimming
0under fish-consumption advisories
11never assessed at all
207water systems
22with an unresolved health-based violation

What the records flag

Needs attention

East Fork Deep River is not considered safe for swimming

A state determination under the Clean Water Act. This is one of several assessed waterways in the area you searched — search a street address to see which waters connect to you.

Listed cause
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Listed cause
FECAL COLIFORM

Official determination, waterway near you · U.S. EPA / state agency — ATTAINS assessed waters

Rivers, creeks & lakes

WaterwaySwimmingEating the fishListed causes
East Fork Deep RiverNot considered safeNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, FECAL COLIFORM
HAW RIVERNot considered safeNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, COPPER
Little Troublesome CreekNot considered safeNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, FECAL COLIFORM
North Buffalo CreekNot considered safeNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, FECAL COLIFORM
Reedy Fork (Hardys Mill Pond)Not considered safeNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, FECAL COLIFORM
Rich ForkNot considered safeNot assessedFECAL COLIFORM, FISH BIOASSESSMENTS
Richland CreekNot considered safeNot assessedFECAL COLIFORM, FISH BIOASSESSMENTS
South Buffalo CreekNot considered safeNot assessedFISH BIOASSESSMENTS, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Belews Creek (including Belews Lake below elevation 725) (1)Not assessedNot assessedTEMPERATURE
Brush CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, FISH BIOASSESSMENTS
DEEP RIVERMeets the standardNot assessedCOPPER, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Hickory CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS

Showing 12 of 96 waterways on record — the full report has all of them. "Not considered safe" is a state determination under the Clean Water Act, not a measurement taken today. "Not assessed" means unknown — never clean.

Drinking water systems

SystemServesHealth-based violations since 2021Without recorded resolution
City of Greensboro319,58800
City of High Point118,66211
Town of Gibsonville8,92000
Town of Jamestown6,54300
Northern Middle-High School2,42700
Town of Stokesdale2,25200
Northeast Consolidated School2,15000
Southern High School1,00000
Southern Middle School87500
Oak Ridge Elem School87400
Summerfield Charter Academy83800
Revolution Academy78011

Showing the 12 largest of 207 active systems serving the county. Health-based violations are shown alone — administrative (paperwork) records are counted separately and never added in, because most violation records are paperwork.

What the record doesn’t establish

  • 11 nearby waterways have never been assessed — their condition is unknown.
  • Whether your home's own plumbing adds lead or copper — no dataset covers indoor pipes.

Common questions

Is tap water safe to drink in Guilford County?

No public dataset can establish that any tap is safe or unsafe — records have gaps, lag by up to a quarter, and say nothing about a building's own plumbing or private wells.

What the records do show: 207 active water systems serve Guilford County. 22 of them currently have an unresolved health-based violation on record. Health-based violations are counted separately from paperwork violations, which make up most records.

Which waterways in Guilford County are not considered safe for swimming?

State assessments under the Clean Water Act list East Fork Deep River, HAW RIVER, Little Troublesome Creek, North Buffalo Creek, Reedy Fork (Hardys Mill Pond) and 6 more as not supporting recreation. That is an official determination about the waterway, not a measurement taken today.

77 of the county's waterways on record have never been assessed for swimming — their condition is unknown.

How current is this data?

Datasets refresh on their agencies' cycles — EPA drinking-water records quarterly, state waterway assessments roughly every two years. The sources table on this page lists the version and retrieval date of every dataset used.

Sources

DatasetAgency versionRetrieved
EPA/state ATTAINS waterway assessmentsATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS snapshot (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-15
ATTAINS waterway geometryATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS lines + areas (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-16
Census TIGER county boundariesCensus TIGERweb Counties (current vintage)2026-08-16
NC DEQ PFAS monitoringNC DEQ DWR EQuIS export, samples through 2025-07-292026-08-17
Census TIGER place boundariesCensus TIGERweb Places (Incorporated + CDP, current vintage)2026-08-16
EPA water system service areasEPA PWS Service Areas v3 (hosted layer, item 80c6912ef14f46e480f5afd807767b4b)2026-08-15
EPA Safe Drinking Water Act compliance recordsECHO SDWA quarterly bulk download2026-08-16
EPA standards & benchmarks2026-08 curation2026-08-15
EPA UCMR5 PFAS monitoringUCMR5 occurrence data (collections through 2025-12-10)2026-08-15
USGS watershed boundariesUSGS WBD via National Map MapServer2026-08-15

Records lag their agencies' refresh cycles — a recent change may not appear yet. Absence from a dataset is absence of a record, never evidence that water is clean.

Go deeper

The interactive report adds the map, monitoring-station samples, permitted operations in connected watersheds, and plain-language explanations of every term.

See the full Guilford County report