WHAT’S BEYOND THE TAP

North Carolina · county

Water quality in Durham County, North Carolina

Two things here need attention.

Two things could not be determined from the record.

Public records for Durham County cover 85 named waterways across 21 sub-watersheds, and 50 active water systems serving about 341,031 people. Below is what those records establish — and what they don't.

85waterways on record
1not considered safe for swimming
8under fish-consumption advisories
11never assessed at all
50water systems
1with an unresolved health-based violation

What the records flag

Needs attention

Northeast Creek is not considered safe for swimming

A state determination under the Clean Water Act. This is one of several assessed waterways in the area you searched — search a street address to see which waters connect to you.

Listed cause
COPPER
Listed cause
FECAL COLIFORM
Listed cause
TURBIDITY

Official determination, waterway near you · U.S. EPA / state agency — ATTAINS assessed waters

Needs attention

Fish from 8 nearby waterways are under consumption advisories

The state has determined this water doesn't meet standards for eating the fish caught in it. It's close to you, but your water doesn't flow from it.

Listed cause
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Listed cause
PCBS - FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORY

Official determination, waterway near you · U.S. EPA / state agency — ATTAINS assessed waters

Rivers, creeks & lakes

WaterwaySwimmingEating the fishListed causes
Crabtree CreekOn record, no conclusionNot considered safeBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, PCBS - FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORY
Crabtree Creek (Crabtree Lake)Meets the standardNot considered safePCBS - FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORY, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Northeast CreekNot considered safeNot assessedCOPPER, FECAL COLIFORM
Beaverdam Creek (Beaverdam Creek Reservoir below normal pool elevation)Not assessedNot assessedCHLOROPHYLL-A - AQUATIC LIFE USE SUPPORT
Black CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Bolin CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Bolin Creek (Hogan Lake)Not assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Booker CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Booker Creek (East-wood Lake)Not assessedMeets the standardBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, DISSOLVED OXYGEN
Brier CreekNot assessedNot considered safePCBS - FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORY
Ellerbe CreekMeets the standardNot assessedFISH BIOASSESSMENTS, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Flat RiverMeets the standardNot assessedDISSOLVED OXYGEN

Showing 12 of 85 waterways on record — the full report has all of them. "Not considered safe" is a state determination under the Clean Water Act, not a measurement taken today. "Not assessed" means unknown — never clean.

Drinking water systems

SystemServesHealth-based violations since 2021Without recorded resolution
City of Durham333,49000
Lake Winds Golf Course75000
Hardscrabble S/d64300
Mangum Elementary School36500
Greymoss S/d36100
Willow Hill S/d32900
Whispering Pines MHP30511
Canterbury Estates29300
Discovery Charter School28500
Fox Run S/d27200
Heather Glen S/d25500
New Red MTN Baptist Church20000

Showing the 12 largest of 50 active systems serving the county. Health-based violations are shown alone — administrative (paperwork) records are counted separately and never added in, because most violation records are paperwork.

What the record doesn’t establish

  • 11 nearby waterways have never been assessed — their condition is unknown.
  • Whether your home's own plumbing adds lead or copper — no dataset covers indoor pipes.

Common questions

Is tap water safe to drink in Durham County?

No public dataset can establish that any tap is safe or unsafe — records have gaps, lag by up to a quarter, and say nothing about a building's own plumbing or private wells.

What the records do show: 50 active water systems serve Durham County. 1 of them currently has an unresolved health-based violation on record. Health-based violations are counted separately from paperwork violations, which make up most records.

Which waterways in Durham County are not considered safe for swimming?

State assessments under the Clean Water Act list Northeast Creek as not supporting recreation. That is an official determination about the waterway, not a measurement taken today.

68 of the county's waterways on record have never been assessed for swimming — their condition is unknown.

How current is this data?

Datasets refresh on their agencies' cycles — EPA drinking-water records quarterly, state waterway assessments roughly every two years. The sources table on this page lists the version and retrieval date of every dataset used.

Sources

DatasetAgency versionRetrieved
EPA/state ATTAINS waterway assessmentsATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS snapshot (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-15
ATTAINS waterway geometryATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS lines + areas (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-16
Census TIGER county boundariesCensus TIGERweb Counties (current vintage)2026-08-16
NC DEQ PFAS monitoringNC DEQ DWR EQuIS export, samples through 2025-07-292026-08-17
Census TIGER place boundariesCensus TIGERweb Places (Incorporated + CDP, current vintage)2026-08-16
EPA water system service areasEPA PWS Service Areas v3 (hosted layer, item 80c6912ef14f46e480f5afd807767b4b)2026-08-15
EPA Safe Drinking Water Act compliance recordsECHO SDWA quarterly bulk download2026-08-16
EPA standards & benchmarks2026-08 curation2026-08-15
EPA UCMR5 PFAS monitoringUCMR5 occurrence data (collections through 2025-12-10)2026-08-15
USGS watershed boundariesUSGS WBD via National Map MapServer2026-08-15

Records lag their agencies' refresh cycles — a recent change may not appear yet. Absence from a dataset is absence of a record, never evidence that water is clean.

Go deeper

The interactive report adds the map, monitoring-station samples, permitted operations in connected watersheds, and plain-language explanations of every term.

See the full Durham County report