WHAT’S BEYOND THE TAP

North Carolina · county

Water quality in Alamance County, North Carolina

One thing here needs attention.

Two things could not be determined from the record.

Public records for Alamance County cover 69 named waterways across 28 sub-watersheds, and 101 active water systems serving about 134,513 people. Below is what those records establish — and what they don't.

69waterways on record
4not considered safe for swimming
0under fish-consumption advisories
9never assessed at all
101water systems
3with an unresolved health-based violation

What the records flag

Needs attention

HAW RIVER is not considered safe for swimming

A state determination under the Clean Water Act. This is one of several assessed waterways in the area you searched — search a street address to see which waters connect to you.

Listed cause
COPPER
Listed cause
FECAL COLIFORM

Official determination, waterway near you · U.S. EPA / state agency — ATTAINS assessed waters

Rivers, creeks & lakes

WaterwaySwimmingEating the fishListed causes
HAW RIVERNot considered safeNot assessedCOPPER, FECAL COLIFORM
Reedy Fork (Hardys Mill Pond)Not considered safeNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS, FECAL COLIFORM
Back Creek (Graham-Mebane Reservoir)Not assessedNot assessedCHLOROPHYLL-A - AQUATIC LIFE USE SUPPORT, NITROGEN, TOTAL
Cane Creek (Cane Creek Reservoir)Not assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Dry CreekNot assessedMeets the standardBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Haw CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Jordan CreekOn record, no conclusionNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Little Alamance Creek (Gant Lake, Mays Lake)(Alamance CountyNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
North Prong Stinking Quarter CreekNot assessedNot assessedFISH BIOASSESSMENTS
Rock CreekNot assessedNot assessedCHLOROPHYLL-A - AQUATIC LIFE USE SUPPORT
Rocky RiverMeets the standardNot assessedCHLOROPHYLL-A - AQUATIC LIFE USE SUPPORT, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS
Stinking Quarter CreekNot assessedNot assessedBENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES BIOASSESSMENTS

Showing 12 of 69 waterways on record — the full report has all of them. "Not considered safe" is a state determination under the Clean Water Act, not a measurement taken today. "Not assessed" means unknown — never clean.

Drinking water systems

SystemServesHealth-based violations since 2021Without recorded resolution
City of Burlington61,36500
City of Mebane20,21200
City of Graham18,35400
Town of Elon11,35000
Town of Haw River2,65000
Town of Swepsonville2,49700
Town of Green Level2,45000
Town of Ossipee2,39000
Southern Middle & High Schools2,33700
Village of Alamance1,20000
Saxapahaw Utility Company88000
Clover Garden Charter School68000

Showing the 12 largest of 101 active systems serving the county. Health-based violations are shown alone — administrative (paperwork) records are counted separately and never added in, because most violation records are paperwork.

What the record doesn’t establish

  • 9 nearby waterways have never been assessed — their condition is unknown.
  • Whether your home's own plumbing adds lead or copper — no dataset covers indoor pipes.

Common questions

Is tap water safe to drink in Alamance County?

No public dataset can establish that any tap is safe or unsafe — records have gaps, lag by up to a quarter, and say nothing about a building's own plumbing or private wells.

What the records do show: 101 active water systems serve Alamance County. 3 of them currently have an unresolved health-based violation on record. Health-based violations are counted separately from paperwork violations, which make up most records.

Which waterways in Alamance County are not considered safe for swimming?

State assessments under the Clean Water Act list HAW RIVER, Reedy Fork (Hardys Mill Pond), Town Branch, Little Troublesome Creek as not supporting recreation. That is an official determination about the waterway, not a measurement taken today.

57 of the county's waterways on record have never been assessed for swimming — their condition is unknown.

How current is this data?

Datasets refresh on their agencies' cycles — EPA drinking-water records quarterly, state waterway assessments roughly every two years. The sources table on this page lists the version and retrieval date of every dataset used.

Sources

DatasetAgency versionRetrieved
EPA/state ATTAINS waterway assessmentsATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS snapshot (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-15
ATTAINS waterway geometryATTAINS_Assessment ArcGIS lines + areas (gispub.epa.gov)2026-08-16
Census TIGER county boundariesCensus TIGERweb Counties (current vintage)2026-08-16
NC DEQ PFAS monitoringNC DEQ DWR EQuIS export, samples through 2025-07-292026-08-17
Census TIGER place boundariesCensus TIGERweb Places (Incorporated + CDP, current vintage)2026-08-16
EPA water system service areasEPA PWS Service Areas v3 (hosted layer, item 80c6912ef14f46e480f5afd807767b4b)2026-08-15
EPA Safe Drinking Water Act compliance recordsECHO SDWA quarterly bulk download2026-08-16
EPA standards & benchmarks2026-08 curation2026-08-15
EPA UCMR5 PFAS monitoringUCMR5 occurrence data (collections through 2025-12-10)2026-08-15
USGS watershed boundariesUSGS WBD via National Map MapServer2026-08-15

Records lag their agencies' refresh cycles — a recent change may not appear yet. Absence from a dataset is absence of a record, never evidence that water is clean.

Go deeper

The interactive report adds the map, monitoring-station samples, permitted operations in connected watersheds, and plain-language explanations of every term.

See the full Alamance County report